#BitcoinRegret of #BitcoinAt10 multimedia series by @coindesk
2/19 When… Prius?
While the #bitcoin industry is infatuated with Lambos, @Rassah couldn't care less about suicide doors and instead purchased a planet-saving Prius.
There's one catch – he did it when bitcoin was at $22. https://t.co/z4lfuPGbpp #BitcoinRegret pic.twitter.com/QJmUUIZLcu
— CoinDesk (@CoinDesk) January 30, 2019
4/19 Fee-Less? Yeah right…
Back in the day, bitcoin was hard to get your hands on.
So enthusiasts, including @SirBitt, has to go through a number of expensive hoops to purchase the cryptocurrency (in his case, from @SecondLife). https://t.co/194JpzTIbx #BitcoinRegret
— CoinDesk (@CoinDesk) January 30, 2019
6/19 Bitcoin is hard.
And @brianchoffman and others @OpenBazaar nearly had a heart attack when they sent $100 worth of #bitcoin that looked like $10,000 worth.
"I was just an idiot," Hoffman tells CoinDesk in this #BitcoinRegret video. https://t.co/JqWnLxIFgK pic.twitter.com/CuwtAPXuJP
— CoinDesk (@CoinDesk) January 30, 2019
8/19 Every 👏 Single 👏 MIT 👏 Undergrad
In 2014, Bitcoin Core dev @JeremyRubin & friends raised half a million dollars to give everyone at the university $100 of #bitcoin.
In hindsight, that's a pretty good amount of bitcoin now. https://t.co/wRRtgDNuZ3 #BitcoinRegret pic.twitter.com/VvmylaX0ER
— CoinDesk (@CoinDesk) January 30, 2019
10/19 I should've been just an investor…
Sure, launching a startup in the space has its benefits. But @coinsetter's @borntobank said buying #bitcoin would have been more lucrative than the exchange.
And definitely less work too. https://t.co/JfqCUODavy #BitcoinRegret pic.twitter.com/D8xzJlxig4
— CoinDesk (@CoinDesk) January 30, 2019
12/19 Our friend, the Haitian President, was overthrown…
Which put a stop to @Kumail_Akbari and @nickspanos Haiticoin project, geared towards bringing some financial stability to impoverished people.https://t.co/6t6mEZN9Pd #BitcoinRegret pic.twitter.com/BEocQy2YDq
— CoinDesk (@CoinDesk) January 30, 2019
15/19 More from the #Bitcoin Civil War
Bitcoin Core developer @Excellion regrets encouraging @brian_armstrong by telling him Bitcoin Classic didn't succeed because he didn't want it badly enough.
Whoa. https://t.co/j4ZTrfzxqc #BitcoinRegret pic.twitter.com/FAqeRKIPTv
— CoinDesk (@CoinDesk) January 30, 2019
17/19 Just a little dip…
Gianni Versace's famous pool got #bitcoin entrepreneurs Jason King of @SeansOutpost and Moe Levin of @keynote_ae thrown out into the street and banned from the mansion…
At least for a couple years.
🤷https://t.co/sLe8KYKMgS #BitcoinRegret pic.twitter.com/zke25TF7LD
— CoinDesk (@CoinDesk) January 30, 2019
19/19 I'm not angry, I'm just disappointed…
So says @DataTranslator, the co-founder of now-defunct Avalon, which produced the world's first #bitcoin ASICs. To him, mining is about securing the network, not making a profit. https://t.co/27DM1KVMIu #BitcoinRegret pic.twitter.com/hc4wWccE3H
— CoinDesk (@CoinDesk) January 30, 2019
Black Swan Theory
The black swan theory is a metaphor that describes an event that comes as a surprise, has a major effect, and is often inappropriately rationalized after the fact with the benefit of hindsight. The term is based on an ancient saying which presumed black swans did not exist, but the saying was rewritten after black swans were discovered in the wild.
The theory was developed by Nassim Nicholas Taleb to explain:
- The disproportionate role of high-profile, hard-to-predict, and rare events that are beyond the realm of normal expectations in history, science, finance, and technology.
- The non-computability of the probability of the consequential rare events using scientific methods (owing to the very nature of small probabilities).
- The psychological biases that blind people, both individually and collectively, to uncertainty and to a rare event’s massive role in historical affairs.
Taleb’s “black swan theory” refers only to unexpected events of large magnitude and consequence and their dominant role in history. Such events, considered extreme outliers, collectively play vastly larger roles than regular occurrences.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_swan_theory
The problem of induction [also once called the Black Swan Problem] is the philosophical question of whether inductive reasoning leads to knowledge understood in the classic philosophical sense,[1]since it focuses on the alleged lack of justification for either:
- Generalizing about the properties of a class of objects based on some number of observations of particular instances of that class (for example, the inference that “all swans we have seen are white, and, therefore, all swans are white”, before the discovery of black swans)
- Presupposing that a sequence of events in the future will occur as it always has in the past (for example, that the laws of physics will hold as they have always been observed to hold). Hume called this the principle of uniformity of nature.

